This paper explores the application of ERM-style techniques to pension funds. It uses the term ‘entity-wide risk management’ rather than ‘enterprise risk management’, even though both have the same acronym (‘ERM’), because many pension funds do not view themselves as business
‘enterprises’ as such. Some of the techniques that business enterprises have for managing risk
(e.g. raising new capital from shareholders or branching into new business areas if existing ones
have unattractive risk-reward characteristics) may not be open to many pension funds. The paper
argues that the holistic approach to risk management (and governance) that is a hallmark of ERM is
as appropriate to pension funds as it is to any other type of entity. This is the case whether the fund
is defined benefit or defined contribution in nature, or a hybrid. It is also the case whether the
‘entity’ is deemed to be the fund itself, the sponsor or the two combined. Indeed, there are aspects of pension arrangements, such as the relationship between the fund and its sponsor, that lend added impetus to the use of ERM-style techniques in practical pension fund management.